Friday, 28 November 2014

An informative video on how the "Single Transferrable Vote" system works.




This is the first in a series of videos I will post on different voting systems.

Thursday, 27 November 2014

How do we elect our representatives and heads of states?

The argument over the best method to elect our officials continues in almost every jurisdiction.

Is First Past the Post, D’Hondt Method, Runoff, Proportional representation, Largest Remainder, combination of systems or one of another dozen systems used in the world the best method.

Here is a quick look at which systems are being used around the world.
 
Method*
Count **
Percentage
FPTP
70
30.97%
D’Hondt Method
52
23.01%
List/Party List
22
9.73%
Run off
21
9.29%
Largest Remainder
20
8.85%
Bloc
6
2.65%
Proportional
5
2.21%
Other***
30
13.27%
* Some use combination of multiple methods depending on level of government to be elected
**Sampling of 226 countries,.
*** Includes Electoral College, Additional Member System, Hare Quota, Droop Quota, IRV, STV, Sainte Laque Method, Parallel, SNTV and more.



FPTP or FPP

A first-past-the-post (abbreviated FPTP or FPP) election is one that is won by the candidate receiving more votes than any other(s). It is a common, but not universal, feature of electoral systems with single-member legislative districts. First-past-the-post voting methods can be used for single and multiple member elections. In a single member election the candidate with the highest number, not necessarily a majority, of votes is elected.


D`Hondt Method

The D'Hondt method[ (mathematically but not operationally equivalent to Jefferson's method) is a highest averages method for allocating seats in party-list proportional representation. The method described is named after Belgian mathematician Victor D'Hondt, who described it in 1878. There are two forms: closed list (a party selects the order of election of their candidates) and an open list (voters' choices determine the order).


Party List

Party-list proportional representation systems are a family of voting systems emphasizing proportional representation (PR) in elections in which multiple candidates are elected (e.g. elections to parliament) through allocations to an electoral list. They can also be used as part of mixed additional member systems.In these systems, parties make lists of candidates to be elected, and seats get allocated to each party in proportion to the number of votes the party receives.


Run off

The two-round system (also known as the second ballot, runoff voting or ballotage) is a voting system used to elect a single winner where the voter casts a single vote for their chosen candidate. However, if no candidate receives the required number of votes (usually an absolute majority or 40-45% with a winning margin of 5-15%), then those candidates having less than a certain proportion of the votes, or all but the two candidates receiving the most votes, are eliminated, and a second round of voting occurs.


Largest Remainder

The largest remainder method requires the numbers of votes for each party to be divided by a quota representing the number of votes required for a seat (i.e. usually the total number of votes cast
divided by the number of seats, or some similar formula). The result for each party will usually consist of an integer part plus a fractional remainder. Each party is first allocated a number of seats equal to their integer. This will generally leave some seats unallocated: the parties are then ranked on the basis of the fractional remainders, and the parties with the largest remainders are each allocated one additional seat until all the seats have been allocated. This gives the method its name.


Block

Plurality-at-large voting, also known as block vote or multiple non-transferable vote (MNTV),  is a non-proportional voting system for electing several representatives from a single multimember electoral district using a series of check boxes and tallying votes similar to a plurality election. Although multiple winners are elected simultaneously, block voting is not a system for obtaining proportional representation; instead, the usual result is that the largest single group wins every seat by electing a slate of candidates, resulting in a landslide.

Even if the term "at-large" describes elections for representative members of a governing body who are elected or appointed to represent the whole membership of the body, this system can be used by a country divided in some multi-member electoral districts, but in this last case the system is commonly referred to as block voting or the bloc vote.
This system is usually based on a single round of vote, but it can sometimes appear in a runoff (two-round) version, as in some local elections in France, where candidates who do not receive an absolute majority must compete in a second round. Here it can be better called as majority-at-large voting.

The term bloc voting sometimes means simple plurality election in multimember districts. In such a system, each party introduces a list of candidates and the party winning a plurality of votes wins all the seats. In contrast to such a system, the system described in this article can be called unlimited voting (contrary to limited voting, in which a voter has fewer votes than the number of seats contested).


Proportional Representation

The term proportional representation (PR) characterizes electoral systems by which divisions in an electorate are reflected proportionately in the elected body. If 30% of the electorate support a particular political party then roughly 30% of seats will be won by that party. The essence of such systems is that all votes contribute to the result, not just a plurality or majority of them.

Proportional representation requires the use of multiple-member voting districts (also called super-districts). Proportional representation is not possible using single-member districts alone.